{"id":30955,"date":"2026-09-01T21:00:10","date_gmt":"2026-09-01T21:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/?p=30955"},"modified":"2026-09-12T05:45:09","modified_gmt":"2026-09-12T05:45:09","slug":"offshore-software-testing-company","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/offshore-software-testing-company","title":{"rendered":"How to Choose the Right Offshore Software Testing Company for Your Business"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"30955\" class=\"elementor elementor-30955\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-1b1c6af e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"1b1c6af\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-fda543c elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"fda543c\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<p data-pm-slice=\"0 0 []\">The average time for the US to fill a Senior Quality Assurance Automation Engineer position is approximately 11 to 14 weeks. When they clear onboarding, you&#8217;ve deployed 2 more releases with the same coverage issues you started with.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s because maths is the reason the outsourced software testing market continues to grow. US alone is estimated to top $7.2 billion in 2025 and reach over $27 billion by 2035, according to analysts. No one does this type of cost arbitrage.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is, all offshore software testing firms sound the same on landing pages. Certifications, &#8220;global talent pool,&#8221; 24\/7 coverage, ISO badges. There&#8217;s a short list of eleven vendors, and each one&#8217;s true strength and the questions that tell you whether you&#8217;ve got the right quality of QA partner or just a staffing invoice.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Quick Results: Offshore Testing Companies at a Glance<\/h2>\n<table><colgroup><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p><strong>Company<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p><strong>Best For<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p><strong>Delivery Base<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p><strong>Key Strength<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p><strong>Think Future Technologies (TFT)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Enterprises wanting QA plus engineering under one roof<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Gurgaon, India<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>19+ years, 700+ projects, ISO 27001, CMMI Level 3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>QASource<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>US-managed offshore QA at scale<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>India \/ US<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Onshore leadership layer<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>ScienceSoft<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Regulated industries needing audit trails<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Global<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Testing practice dating to 1989<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Cigniti (Coforge)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Fortune 500 digital assurance programmes<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Hyderabad, India<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Enterprise scale and tooling<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Qualitest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Very large, multi-year QA outsourcing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Global<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Sheer delivery capacity<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>QA Mentor<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Broad geographic and device coverage<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>100+ countries<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Distributed tester network<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>TestFort<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Mid-market product companies<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Eastern Europe<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Engineering-first QA culture<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>DeviQA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Startups and SaaS scale-ups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Eastern Europe<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Fast automation ramp-up<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>ImpactQA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>BFSI and healthcare QA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>India \/ US<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Domain-heavy test design<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Testlio<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Crowd-based real-device testing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Distributed<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Compatibility testing at scale<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Belitsoft<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Teams needing QA bundled with dev<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Eastern Europe<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\n<p>Rapid team scaling<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>What an Offshore Software Testing Company Actually Does<\/h2>\n<p>Offshore software testing refers to giving all or some of your quality assurance to another country and time zone. The obvious benefit is cost. The less apparent is clock coverage. Your programmers commit new code at 6 PM Eastern, and a test run is completed before they fire up their laptops again.<\/p>\n<p>When poorly done, however, offshoring only moves your bottleneck. You receive bug reports no one can replicate and an automation suite that destroys each sprint. A well-done offshore testing partner delivers quality results, not ticket counts.<\/p>\n<p>According to Belitsoft, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/offshore-testing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>offshore software testing services<\/strong><\/a> allow businesses to access the expertise they need remotely while keeping costs reasonable compared with maintaining an in-house testing team.<\/p>\n<blockquote data-start=\"481\" data-end=\"1504\">\n<h3 class=\"PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer\" data-section-id=\"bfop5f\" data-start=\"483\" data-end=\"539\">Case Study: How Skype Used Offshore Testing at Scale<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"544\" data-end=\"823\">Skype provides a strong example of how an offshore testing partnership can evolve into a long-term quality engineering function. The company has worked with TestFort for 24 years, with more than 180 QA engineers involved and testing coverage across 250+ real devices.<br \/><br \/><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"828\" data-end=\"1140\">The offshore team handled comprehensive testing across Skype&#8217;s web and mobile platforms, including automation, CI\/CD integration, performance engineering, and high-load testing. It also introduced AI-powered defect prediction and test optimization to identify potential issues earlier in the development process.<br \/><br \/><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1145\" data-end=\"1504\">The partnership demonstrates that offshore QA does not have to be limited to executing predefined test cases. With the right technical expertise and integration with development workflows, an offshore testing team can become an extension of the product engineering organization and support continuous quality improvement.<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/testfort.com\/blog\/top-offshore-testing-companies\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/offshore-software-testing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Offshore testing<\/a> comes with its own operational and technical challenges. This TestGuild episode explores common software testing challenges and the solutions teams can use to address them\u2014useful context when evaluating what to expect from a professional offshore testing partner.<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/RYzdcvRfM1g?si=OkEfCtCsFpvAMo6r\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h2>How We Ranked These Offshore Testing Companies<\/h2>\n<h3>Verifiable track record<\/h3>\n<p>Long-term operation, project volume, and dedicated work of the client that can be verified outside the vendor&#8217;s site.<\/p>\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/testfort.com\/blog\/offshore-software-testing-when-and-why\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">TestFort<\/a>, a strong offshore QA vendor should be able to demonstrate a comprehensive project portfolio that includes delivered services, project timelines, team size, and relevant industry experience.<\/p>\n<h3>Certification and security posture<\/h3>\n<p>The issue of ISO 27001 and CMMI maturity is more important than what most buyers believe, particularly when your data is no longer in your jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<h3>Depth of technical expertise<\/h3>\n<p>Table stakes is functional testing. We considered automation structures, performance tests, security, accessibility, and compatibility tests.<\/p>\n<h3>Domain fluency<\/h3>\n<p>A tester with knowledge of claims adjudication is more likely to be aware of different bugs than a tester with no such knowledge.<\/p>\n<h3>Engagement flexibility<\/h3>\n<p>Dedicated offshore QA team, project-based, or managed service, and how painful it is to switch between them.<\/p>\n<h2>The 11 Best Offshore Software Testing Companies in 2026<\/h2>\n<h3>Think Future Technologies (TFT)<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Headquarters: <\/strong>Gurgaon, India<\/p>\n<p><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2006 \u00b7<\/p>\n<p><strong>Offices:<\/strong> India, US, Mexico, Israel<\/p>\n<p>TFT is a software engineering company that has an independent testing practice within it &#8211; which happens to be the most significant difference in complex programs.<\/p>\n<p>Over 19 years operating. Over 700 projects completed. CMMI Level 3 appraised and ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified. It has been rated as one of the Technology Fast 50 of Deloitte in India.<\/p>\n<p>The work with clients includes Apple, Adobe, Microsoft, Sauce Labs, Shutterstock, and Namshi \u2013 product companies with truly inexcusable release cycles.<\/p>\n<p>What the QA testing services include: manual and exploratory testing, test automation, performance testing, security and penetration testing, accessibility testing, localization testing, mobile and cross-browser compatibility testing, and API validation.<\/p>\n<p>The reason why it is at the top of the list: the majority of the vendors in this list specialize in testing. TFT can co-locate QA engineers, developers, DevOps, and data engineers on the same program, eliminating the time-honored offshore failure mode, the interminable debate on whether it is a defect or a requirement gap.<\/p>\n<p>The security team has form, too. Intel, Edmodo and SoundCloud products have reported and been attributed vulnerabilities by TFT researchers. It is not marketing copy; it is disclosed, patched, and acknowledged work.<\/p>\n<p>TFT is also used to service virtualize teams that are stuck by unavailable third-party systems &#8211; a viable solution when your payment gateway sandbox is out of commission for a week, and your testing environment hangs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for: <\/strong>a company has a funded product that requires an offshore testing partner that can absorb the engineering workload as the partnership progresses.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth considering:<\/strong> in case you seek a pure-play QA vendor that has no development arm, then perhaps a specialist would fit into the model you are pursuing in procurement.<\/p>\n<p>[Internal link: \/offshore-software-testing-services] [Internal link: \/software-testing]<\/p>\n<h3>2. QASource<\/h3>\n<p>A pure-play QA vendor that is among the larger ones, having 20 years of specialization and a delivery model integrating US-based leadership with offshore testing teams based in India.<\/p>\n<p>Healthcare, financial, and enterprise SaaS. Proprietary automation accelerators help with high-volume regression work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> Companies that desire offshore economics with an onshore account layer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth considering:<\/strong> the managed-service system implies less control over individual testers.<\/p>\n<h3>3. ScienceSoft<\/h3>\n<p>Since 1989, it has been testing and has ISO 9001 and ISO 27001-compliant processes and works in 30 or more industries.<\/p>\n<p>The quality of documentation is a common theme in client feedback, and it is crucial when regulatory compliance is involved.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best suited:<\/strong> finance, e-commerce, and healthcare sites in audit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth considering:<\/strong> \u00a0process overhead is associated with process rigor. Sometimes it is cumbersome for fast-moving startups.<\/p>\n<h3>4. Cigniti Technologies (Coforge)<\/h3>\n<p>QA has been running since 1998 and was bought in 2024 by Coforge, which enlarged its delivery base significantly.<\/p>\n<p>Offices in the US, UK, Australia, Canada, UAE and Singapore; Hyderabad delivery centers. Fortune 500 names can be found in Portfolio.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for: <\/strong>multi-year enterprise-scale digital assurance programs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing:<\/strong> small groups are likely to be locked out when it comes to the minimum engagement sizes.<\/p>\n<h3>5<strong>. <\/strong>Qualitest<\/h3>\n<p>A very large independent QA organization, designed to support very large outsourcing deals and full transfers of QA functions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> businesses that are substituting a whole in-house testing organization.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing:<\/strong> purchasing strength in theirs, not yours. Negotiate hard.<\/p>\n<h3>6. QA Mentor<\/h3>\n<p>Abnormally broad geographic coverage &#8211; a distributed testnet across over a hundred countries, and virtually any device and time zone combination.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> compatibility testing of truly fragmented device and locale matrices.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing:<\/strong> distributed models demand stricter discipline on your part in test cases.<\/p>\n<h3>7. TestFort<\/h3>\n<p>The QArea Group, where engineering is the primary focus of QA culture and a push into AI-based defect prediction is proclaimed.<\/p>\n<p>Approximately 180 QA engineers, in operation since 2001.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for: <\/strong>mid-market product companies seeking senior testers but not priced as an enterprise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing:<\/strong> not as large as the large vendors, and thus fast scaling might take time.<\/p>\n<h3>8. DeviQA<\/h3>\n<p>Concentrated, automation-intensive, and rapid to establish test infrastructure at the beginning of an engagement.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> startups and SaaS teams that require automation coverage until their next funding round.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing:<\/strong> reduced depth in highly regulated verticals.<\/p>\n<h3>9. ImpactQA<\/h3>\n<p>Bets on AI-assisted automation and understands BFSI and healthcare to formulate meaningful questions in the discovery.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> working with finance and healthcare websites that require domain-literate test design.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing: <\/strong>make sure who actually staffs your account by signature.<\/p>\n<h3>10. Testlio<\/h3>\n<p>Real-life and testable managed crowd model on real devices in real life \u2014 difficult to recreate in a laboratory.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> consumer applications that require wide device, network and geographical coverage.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing: <\/strong>not as well suited to deep regression ownership of automation.<\/p>\n<h3>11. Belitsoft<\/h3>\n<p>Supported by the Noventiq Group, which has 400-plus experts, and can scale a project more quickly than most other providers that offer such services.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> a team requires both QA and development with a single vendor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Worth knowing:<\/strong> testing is not a standalone activity but is co-located with development.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>How to Choose the Right Offshore Testing Partner<\/h2>\n<h3>Match the Engagement Model to Your Stage<\/h3>\n<p>Pre-product-market-fit, purchase a small, specific offshore QA team that you can divert on a weekly basis. Buy managed outcomes post-Series B with specified SLAs. Buy a program, enterprise, governance, reporting, and an escalation path to a person of authority. The most frequent cause of failure of offshore QA engagements is mismatching of these.<\/p>\n<h3>Interview the Offshore QA Team, Not the Sales Deck<\/h3>\n<p>Request that you be allowed to meet the real testers who will man your account. Not the head of delivery. The testers. Then have them tell about the most recent bug they found that the developer initially contested. True testers jump at that.<\/p>\n<h3>Ask What Happens to Your Test Automation<\/h3>\n<p>Who is the owner of the framework? In which location does the code exist? Can you take it with you? When the solution is some proprietary platform that you cannot export, then you are leasing your own regression suite. Good vendors deliver code in your repository, a mainstream framework, on the first day.<\/p>\n<h3>Treat Regulatory Compliance as a Design Input<\/h3>\n<p>HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, SOC 2 -all alter what your testing teams can even touch. Inquire about the location of test data, whether production data is ever accessed, and how access is revoked once a tester rolls off. Any offshore software testing company that fails to do so in a single call has not even thought about it.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h3 class=\"PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer\" data-section-id=\"stdjtn\" data-start=\"1672\" data-end=\"1721\">Case Study: Offshore Testing for a UK Neobank<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"1726\" data-end=\"1971\">A major UK neobank partnered with TestFort to handle offshore software testing for its financial services platform. Because the product operated in a highly regulated environment, the testing engagement required more than standard functional QA.<br \/><br \/><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1976\" data-end=\"2319\">The offshore team provided automation frameworks, penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and specialized fintech testing. The team also worked with requirements around PCI-DSS compliance and high-frequency transaction processing, ensuring that security and regulatory considerations were incorporated into the testing process.<br \/><br \/><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"2324\" data-end=\"2630\">This example highlights why domain expertise should be a major consideration when selecting an offshore QA partner. For regulated products, the testing team needs to understand the industry&#8217;s compliance requirements alongside the technical behavior of the application.<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/testfort.com\/blog\/top-offshore-testing-companies\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>Check Real Technical Expertise, Not Tool Logos<\/h3>\n<p>All of them mention Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, JMeter, and Appium. There are fewer that can tell why they selected one over another for your architecture. Request a sample test strategy form of a similar project. Redacted is fine. Vagueness is not.<\/p>\n<h3>Do Not Skip Performance Testing Scope<\/h3>\n<p>Functional coverage is readily marketable and readily quantifiable. Performance testing is postponed, and it turns into an emergency a week before the launch. Should state load, stress, and scalability testing and not change request in initial statement of work.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>What Offshore Testing Services Cost<\/h2>\n<p>Rates are diverse, depending on region, seniority, and engagement model.<\/p>\n<p>Testing is a standard measure of the cost of a project and usually consumes 15 to 25 percent of the overall project cost, depending on the complexity and regulatory exposure.<\/p>\n<p>Compare to the actual internal alternative. One US-based senior QA automation engineer costs about $130,000 to 145,000 per year, including benefits load.<\/p>\n<p>Be suspicious of prices that appear too good to be true. It typically implies junior testers, high turnover, and a hidden cost that you incur in escaped defects.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Red Flags When Evaluating Any Software Testing Company<\/h2>\n<p><strong>No named references in your industry.<\/strong> \u00a0Wall logos are not references.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reluctance to run a paid pilot.<\/strong> A two-week trial engagement speaks louder than any RFP response.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bug reports without reproduction steps.<\/strong> Request anonymized samples prior to signing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>No defined ramp-down.<\/strong> All contracts have an expiry date. Know how.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Measures of activity, not quality. <\/strong>A vanity number is the number of test cases run. Defect escape rate is not.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>What is an offshore software testing company?<\/h3>\n<p>A company in another country that does part or all of your QA &#8211; functional, automation, performance, security, and compatibility testing- often on the other side of a time zone that increases your working day.<\/p>\n<h3>To what extent can offshore testing services save?<\/h3>\n<p>Most organizations experience 30-50% similar to offshore recruiting, but the scope varies significantly based on seniority mix and where. The bigger saving tends to be speed: releases that are weeks ahead due to regression running overnight.<\/p>\n<h3>Will my intellectual property be safe in the offshore?<\/h3>\n<p>It occurs when the vendor is ISO 27001-controlled, has signed binding NDAs, access to the environment is limited, and the vendor operates within your repositories, not their own. Request the certificate. Verify the range and expiry of it.<\/p>\n<h3>Should I outsource all QA or maintain some in-house?<\/h3>\n<p>Most of the teams suit well with hybrid. Have a small on-site QA head who owns strategy, acceptance, and offshore execution capacity. This single in-house position averts that drying up of long offshore operations caused by drifting.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the time-to-productivity of an offshore QA team?<\/h3>\n<p>Two to four weeks to functional coverage on a well-documented product. Meaningful automation is between 6 and 10. Anyone who says he will be fully productive in week one will be talking about a demo, rather than a delivery.<\/p>\n<h3>\u00a0<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The average time for the US to fill a Senior Quality Assurance Automation Engineer position is approximately 11 to 14 weeks. When they clear onboarding, you&#8217;ve deployed 2 more releases with the same coverage issues you started with. It&#8217;s because maths is the reason the outsourced software testing market continues to grow. US alone is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":31065,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-outsourcing","category-offshore-software-testing"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30955"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30955\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31083,"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30955\/revisions\/31083"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tftus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}